Here are just a few of the errors I got while trying to track down the ever-elusive NY Times article that supposedly exonerates Bushs' military record. These searches were all done on the NY Times site. They included many different phrases, and I searched for both the date of May 8th, plus the entire previous week. It searched the entire newspaper, all sections included. And before you ask, yes, I have access to the entire paper. I got a similar errors with every inquiry. These are just five.
There were no matches for your search bush awol in Full Article AND bush military records in Full Article on 05/08/2003.
There were no matches for your search "Bush wasn't AWOL" in Full Article AND "Bush completed" in Full Article on 05/07/2003.
There were no matches for your search "Bush's military records" in Full Article AND "Bush fulfills military duty" in Full Article from 05/06/2003 to 05/08/2003.
Your search for "Bush absent without leave" in Full Article AND "Bush fulfilled his duty" in Full Article from 05/04/2003 to 05/11/2003 returned 0 articles.
There were no matches for your search "Bush absent without leave" in Full Article AND "Bush fulfilled his duty" in Full Article from 05/04/2003 to 05/11/2003.
As my grandfather use to say, I feel like I'm looking for black golfballs. Norm has provided an excellent link to a site called Orcinus, and they deal with this issue much better than I ever could. Plus it's full of REAL links to Real news sites that are also shredding any "new found" evidence that Bush was anything but AWOL. Haven't been to them all yet, but I feel I can rest my case soundly now, which is good because I'm really bored with it. Thanks Norm.
